in soul pursuit

in soul pursuit

Thursday, 6 February 2014

Full Circle with Rabindranath Tagore


 
 
 
I have just completed a short article for Arvind Radhakrishnan for ‘The Bangalore Review’. He hopes it will appear in March. The title is Psychotherapy and Counselling: Pseudo-Science or Pseudo-Myth? and I take up some of the themes of my Indian lectures, in particular how psychology takes its understanding from its conception of psyche, especially in the relationship between mind and body. Drawing on the writings of Ludwig Wittgenstein I argue that it is more fruitful to see psychology as means of ‘seeing the foundation of possible buildings’ rather than appealing to the pseudo-objectivity of science. However the greatest pleasure in writing it for me was to return to the writings of Rabindranath Tagore. In the first article I wrote for an Indian publication (IIC) almost twenty years ago I concluded with the Nobel laureate’s words. Returning to his last lectures for this article I was struck once again by how pertinent and prescient his comments written in 1941, at the age of eighty, are. I am posting the final paragraphs of the latest article here and conclude with one of my favourite verses from Tagore’s ‘Gitanjali’. I hope you enjoy them.

 

Love

 

Peter

 

‘In this respect Wittgenstein saw the value of Freud’s contribution to our understanding of the mind being not the observations of a pseudo-scientist but of someone who ‘changes the perspective’ of their interlocutor:

 

When a dream is interpreted we might say that it is fitted into a context in which it ceases to be puzzling. In a sense the dreamer re-dreams his dream in surroundings such that its aspect changes…

In considering what a dream is, it is important to consider what happens to it, the way its aspect changes when it is brought into relation with other things remembered, for instance. (LC: 45-46)

 

Following this thought-way, a key point I would like to conclude this short article is that we should view the practice of spiritual direction, counselling and therapy as unlike other modes of healing, in particular, scientific based modes. There is a tendency today to relate counselling to scientific and observable, quantifiable and empirical ‘outcomes’. As Robert Johnson says:

 

When people enter therapy today with (a hunger for the divine) many healthcare professionals try to talk them out of their experiences; too many mainstream therapists pathologise the client’s dreams and visions and make every attempt to get this neurotic individual back into the humdrum world of so-called ‘normality’. (Johnson 1996:13)

 

I would argue such a position is doomed to failure as therapy and counselling are themselves modes of operation other than and in many ways alien to the operations of the dividing and cutting cognitive mind. They are more at home in the unheimlich – that which is ‘not at home’ – that which is ushered in by the strange and inexplicable phenomena from the ‘meadows of the underworld’. In this respect, I would argue, the successful therapist or spiritual director is closer to that of the artist and poet than to the scientist or analytical investigator. Freud, and Jung understood this despite Freud’s attempts to put his nascent discipline on a more ‘objective’ and ‘scientific’ footing. This seems to have wrong-footed later commentators. With the benefit of hindsight we could conclude by saying that counselling and psychotherapy owe more to the realm of myth-making than scientific observation and how we understand that will depend on our view of the value of mythos in a world increasingly obsessed by the emergent dominance of the logos.

As the West seeks to recover mythos through the arts of psychotherapy and counselling my own hope would be that India, with her rich traditions of mythos, will be able to preserve this perspective for future generations. Twenty years ago I concluded an article for an Indian journal with the words of the Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore. In one of his last articles, written in 1941 and called ‘Crisis in Civilisation’ he wrote:

 

The spectre of a new barbarity strides over Europe, teeth bare and claws unconcealed in an orgy of terror… the spirit of violence dormant perhaps in the psychology of the West has roused itself and is ready to desecrate the spirit of Man. (Tagore 1961:358)

 

As I return to Bangalore and see the spirit of innovation, industry and enterprise fill the city I am delighted for the prosperity it will bring my friends here. However, like Tagore, I fear the ‘spirit of violence’ dormant in the calculative role of the logos. Mythos and logos both are needed for the true development of the human spirit. Tagore’s final hope was that ‘a new dawn will come from this horizon, from the East where the sun rises’ (Tagore 1961:359). As India integrates the insights of Western psychology with its own mythic systems my own hope would be that Indian intellectual life will preserve both mythos and logos in the future psychological paths it undertakes.’

 

 

 

 

 

Have you not heard his silent steps? He comes, comes, ever comes.

Every moment and every age, every day and every night he comes, comes, ever comes.

Many a song have I sung in many a mood of mind, but all their notes have always proclaimed, `He comes, comes, ever comes.'

In the fragrant days of sunny April through the forest path he comes, comes, ever comes.

In the rainy gloom of July nights on the thundering chariot of clouds he comes, comes, ever comes.

In sorrow after sorrow it is his steps that press upon my heart, and it is the golden touch of his feet that makes my joy to shine.

 

Monday, 3 February 2014

Picturing the Soul




I finally pushed the button to send my Indian lectures to DVK for the publication process this morning. The proposed title is 'Picturing the Soul: Revisioning Psychotherapy and Spiritual Direction'. They are hoping they will be published (Dharmram) by June. So here's a sneak preview from Chapter One...

love

Peter




Psyche

The words ‘psychology’, ‘psychotherapy’ and ‘psychiatry’ all have their roots in the Greek word psychē/ψυχή . As well as attachments to the mysterious Greek goddess of that name the original Greek word relates to a number of concepts that can be translated as breath, bright, coloured, iridescent, moving, life, spirit and even butterfly (See Tyler 1997:82). These fragile creatures, so memorably described by the German poet Hermann Hesse in his poem Schmetterlinge im Spätsommer, have what the Germans call the sense of the unheimlich or ‘not-at-home-ness’ which often characterises the workings of what us children and grandchildren of Freud might call the ‘unconscious’:

 

          The time of many butterflies has come…

Expensively dressed, in pearls and satin;

          Glittering in jewels, they sway before us.

          Splendid and sad, silent and possessed;

          Strangers here, bedecked in the honeydew

          Of the arcadian under-meadows they left in paradise.

          Short-lived guests from the East,

          That we in dreams, forgotten homeland, see,

Receiving their pledge of a more perfect world. 

(Hesse, H. Schmetterlinge im Spätsommer in Schmetterlinge: translation Peter Tyler)[1]

 

From Sigmund Freud (1856 - 1939) onwards Western culture has sought to ‘pin down’ the iridescent, sparkling and constantly changing psyche into particular categories. In the hundred years or so since Freud published his first papers in Vienna the science and study of psychology has flourished and developed in many different directions. The direction taken by psychology and psychologists has often depended on their attitude to what is called the mind-body problem, or, as the contemporary British philosopher Colin McGinn puts it ‘how can the water of the physical brain be turned into the wine of consciousness?’[2] Simply put, when we consider the rich storehouses of our mental lives – dreams, fantasies, thoughts, memories, motivations etc. and then look at the physical processes of a chunk of grey material the size of an average cauliflower we seem to have two different materials – two different substances even – how can the two be related?

Although of great contemporary scientific and medical relevance this question is not new and has troubled philosophers for centuries, beginning with Plato (429 –347 BCE). How we respond to this question will determine our view of psychology, psychotherapy and ultimately of mind/soul. Broadly speaking, since the development of the cognitive sciences and medical approaches from the middle of the twentieth century onwards there has been a branch of psychology that tries to reduce, or at least limit the functions of the mind to those of physical brain processes (much present-day cognitive psychology would fall into this category) and a branch of psychology which attempts to interpret mental function without necessarily relating it to physical function (many psycho-analytic and counselling approaches would tend to fall into this category).

The ‘Father of Psychology’, Sigmund Freud, fell into both categories. Trained originally to investigate cognitive processes through physiological means under the influence of the then fashionable ideas of Hermann von Helmholtz (1821 -1894), he later became interested in the functioning of psychic processes qua psychic processes. His middle to later work shows the influence of both approaches and he seems to have lived in uneasy tension between the two. We shall return to this tension in our final chapter.

One of his earliest collaborators and original psychological thinker in his own right, Carl Gustav Jung (1875 –1961) tended to move away from reductionist views of the mind and saw mental processes as part of a larger, or in his terms, archetypal psyche out of which much of human civilization, development and indeed religion derives.

Following on the insights of Freud and Jung later psychologists have concentrated on key aspects of psychological development, the processes of intellectual thought and the development of human emotion and feeling. We shall return to these in a later chapter. Indeed, many of the developments and ideas of psychology over the past hundred years seem so self-evident to us and are taken for granted that we do not realize how relatively modern they are in terms of human cultural development. We speak easily and knowingly of someone being ‘extrovert’ or ‘introvert’ and we use phrases such as ‘the unconscious’ or ‘the ego’ without really considering what we mean by these terms. In fact, all of these terms, as used today, are relatively modern in their development and usage. Coupled with these developments of our understanding of personality we have also largely increased our understanding of the physiological functioning of the brain and how this relates to psychological functioning. The upshot of this is that we now have a vastly differing view of mind than held at any time throughout the 2,000 years of Christian history.

 

The Therapist

If the psyche is indeed ‘iridescent and sparkling’ like a butterfly, how then do we ‘heal the butterfly’ – be a therapōs of the psychē? If you have ever picked up a butterfly to release it from its prison in your house you will know the care required to transport it to freedom without damaging its gentle and fragile nature. This is the challenge that faces all who work with the psyche whether they be counsellors, therapists, clergy, lay healers, psychiatrists or spiritual directors. And it is on this delicate and finely wrought cusp between the gentle mystery of the life of the psyche and the intervention of the practitioner that this book lies.

          In seeking a mode of expression and analysis of this process a helpful guide is the postmodern philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889- 1951). Commenting on the role of the philosophy in the contemporary world, he stated:

 

Philosophy may in no way interfere with the actual use of language; it can in the end only describe it. For it cannot give it any foundation either.

It leaves everything as it is.  (Philosophical Investigations: 124, hereafter PI)[3]

 

Philosophy simply puts everything before us, and neither explains nor deduces anything. – Since everything lies open to view there is nothing to explain. (PI: 126)

 

Philosophy, like therapy, counselling or spiritual direction, is for Wittgenstein a process of seeing correctly what lies before us.[4] So, in the case of our trapped butterfly, we don’t have to prod and push it but observe its movements, how it flutters, now this way, now that, until we can see at which point we can gently usher it towards its exit and freedom:

 

What is your aim in philosophy? – To show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle. (PI: 309)

 

As Kunkel said, we ‘watch and we wait’.



[1] Die Zeit der vielen Falter ist gekommen…
                Kostbar an Farben, pelz- und samtbesetzt,
                Juwelenshillernd schweben sie enher,
                Prächtig und traurig, schweigsam und benommen,
                Aus untergangner Märchenwelt gekommen,
                Fremdlinge hier, noch honigtaubenetz
                Aus paradiesischen, arkadischen Auen,
                Kurzlebige Gäste aus dem Morgenland,
                Das wir im Traum, verlorene Heimat, schauen
                Und dessen Geisterbotschaft wir vertrauen
                Als eines edleren Daseins holdem Pfand.
 
[2] See, for example ‘Can we solve the mind-body problem?’ in Mind 98 (1989) reprinted in Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology ed. J. Heil, Oxford: OUP 2004.
[3] For more on the relationship between Wittgenstein’s philosophy and Christian spirituality see Tyler 2011.
[4] Wittgenstein uses the phrase Übersichtlichkeit – literally, ‘right seeing’ or ‘clear overview’. For an excellent recent discussion on Wittgenstein’s choreography of saying and showing in relation to his views of self see Chapter Two of Jose Nandhikkara’s Being Human after Wittgenstein (Nandhikkara 2011).

Friday, 31 January 2014

Candlemas, Turtle-Doves and Snowdrops...



According to Jacobus de Voragine, Candlemas (2nd February) derives from two ancient Roman feasts which were both celebrated at the calends of February – one honoured Februa the mother of Mars, the Roman god of war, and the other honouring Februus – one of the gods of the underworld. Either way, both feasts involved lighting the world with candles and lanterns. So we are at the stormy beginning of a new year (for the medievals the year will begin on 25th March – the annunciation of Our Lady – as it did with the Romans and the Spring equinox - preserved today in the beginning of our tax year in the UK...). Finally, after three months of waiting, we in the Northern hemisphere are stepping out of the darkness into the fragile hope of a new year.

Traditionally the feast is associated with two gentle creatures: the turtledove and the snowdrop. The former is in reference to the creature specified for sacrifice for the purification of a mother 40 days after childbirth according to the Book of Leviticus. De Voragine, again, is at pains to stress the gentleness, meekness and divinity of the turtle-dove as opposed to the pigeon – ‘a lascivious bird’ – perhaps a cousin of those gulls and crows that attacked Pope Francis’s doves last weekend?

Sadly our population of turtle doves has declined rapidly in recent years (I picture one here). I can remember them as a child sitting in meadows near our house, purring away with that strange song that sounds more like a cat than a bird. Apparently they are delicious and are regularly hunted on their migration across Europe to the UK. John of the Cross speaks beautifully about them at the end of the ‘Spiritual Canticle’, for him, they presage the end of winter and ‘the time of changes’ and speak of the warm months to come. And what a winter it has been! No snow and ice as yet but such storms! I got back from India to witness my greenhouse raised from the ground by a mini-tornado that hit South London. Fortunately I had moved my lemon tree into the house for the duration but my cactus collection is now looking a little sorry for itself.

George Mackay Brown, the great Orkney Catholic poet, also described this fragile and gentle moment of the year well, using that traditional Candlemas symbol, the snowdrop. Here are two extracts from his diaries:


‘So this is a good feeling to know that we are in the last week of winter. February, I always think, brings winter to a close. But I expect there will be a few wintry days yet...

January, and even more February, sees this swift rising of the fountains of light. The miracle of renewal is happening so quickly before our very eyes... Spring !’ (2.3.95)


 ‘So we pray for the ferocious tyrant of January to pass away, and for his gentler daughter February to assume her reign. See, she comes, snowdrops and crocuses spilling from her fingers...’ (1.2.96)


Thomas Merton too (see earlier post) also sensed this gentle tilt of the seasons six weeks after the Solstice and described it in his own memorable way:


‘Today was the prophetic day, the first of the real shining spring: not that there was not warm weather last week, not that there will not be cold weather again. But this was the day of the year when spring became truly credible...

With the new, comes also memory: as if that which was once so fresh in the past (days of discovery, when I was 19 or 20) were very close again, and as if one were beginning to live again from the beginning: one must experience spring like that. A whole new chance! A complete renewal!’  (17.2.66)


So, on this blessed Candlemas day, I wish you all happiness for the renewal of the year as the ‘fountains of light’ return... and I pray we may have some more clement weather in the weeks to come!


Love


Peter

Monday, 27 January 2014

Happy Feast of St Thomas Aquinas!


Happy Feast Day of St Thomas Aquinas!
Especially to all my Dominican friends and their supporters and my university colleagues!

For this post I have gone back to my Indian lectures which I am presently writing up looking at how Thomas’ theology influenced both St John of the Cross and St Ignatius Loyola (both studied him at Alcala and Salamanca Universities). I attach the relevant passages below arguing that John and Ignatius acquired two important qualities from Aquinas:

·        The notion that ‘grace builds upon nature’, ie. that matter is not essentially evil and that the spiritual journey is not a continual struggle with the material elements of our life. Aquinas presents what we would today call a ‘holistic approach’ to the spiritual life.

·        And secondly, that the most direct way of achieving our spiritual potential is to imitate the ‘habit’ of Christ in all our behavior.


I hope you like the extracts and do spend today rejoicing in the beauty of God’s material creation.


love


Peter



‘In considering John and the appetites the first thing to take into account, as Chowning states, is that John’s negation ‘has nothing to do with neoplatonic dualism or a denial of creation… (he) is thoroughly Christian and incarnational. He exalts the beauty and dignity of creation and the purpose for which God created the world… thus, creation reflects the presence, beauty and excellence of God and increases love in the person who reflects upon it’ (Chowning 2000:3). As a teacher and novice-master John encouraged his students to find God in nature and the created order around. We saw above how Ignatius talked of ‘God in all things’ and the Exercises ends with a remarkable ‘Contemplation to Attain Love’ where we read of the soul contemplating how:


God dwells in creatures, in the elements, giving them being, in the plants allowing them to grow, in the animals feeding upon them, in people giving them to understand, and so in me, giving me being, animating me, giving me sensation and making me to understand (and how) God works and labours for me in all things created on the face of the earth – that is, behaves like one who labours – as in the heavens, elements, plants, fruits, cattle etc, giving them being, preserving them, giving them growth and feeling. (Exx 235,236)


For both John and Ignatius, God is seen as being in all creation and creation, as created by God, is very good indeed. Included in this is the human person, created in the image and likeness of God with all that that entails. In this respect both John and Ignatius have thoroughly absorbed St. Thomas Aquinas in their university training in Salamanca and Paris respectively. Both show a true Thomist grasp of God’s salvific action proceeding through ‘grace building upon nature’. Therefore, our spiritual practices are not so much concerned with escaping matter and creation but rather examining our own attitudes to nature and seeing how our craving and desire to seize matter is distorting our fundamental orientation as a being created in the image and likeness of God:


John insists that what obstructs our relationship with God is not material reality as such, but the human heart when it craves, desires and tries to possess material objects, people and situations for selfish reasons. (Chowning 2000:4)


......................................................................


Yet, as ever in his approach, John counsels two approaches to this steep and rugged path to perfection. First, that we should not despair in thinking about the path, but rather consider a practical approach to how these desires can be redirected. And secondly, that we take the same gentleness and pastoral sensitivity to the ascent which he himself took in his own dealings with penitents. Thus in A 1.13 he counsels four methods for ‘redirection of the appetites’.

The first is derived from the classic Thomist position described above. We must strive in all our actions and habits to ‘imitate Christ’ at all times. Thomas stresses that we should adopt the habitus of Christ, so that more and more in an unthinking (unconscious) fashion we adopt the ways and manner of living of Christ ‘by bringing your life into conformity with his’. See Summa Theologiae 1a2ae.49-54, Vol 22 translated by Antony Kenny: ‘Dispositions, like capacities, are concerned with good and evil, and dispositions, like capacities, are not always exercised in action’ (49,4.3).’


Teresa of Avila... Doctor of the Church... Oxford 1st February






Dear All

As I received my copy of 'Teresa of Avila: Doctor of the Soul' this morning this by way of notice of the teaching day I will be running at Rewley House, Oxford this Saturday. I attach some of the descriptor below:


Teresa of Avila:
Doctor of the Soul
A day school to be held at
Rewley House, 1 Wellington
Square, Oxford
To enrol online, add the code V620-119 to
the URL for the Department’s website:
www.conted.ox.ac.uk/V620-119.


FEE OPTIONS
With full lunch £71.00
With baguette lunch £63.50
Without lunch (includes t / c) £60.00
Vegetarian option (meal or baguette)?



TERESA OF AVILA: DOCTOR OF THE SOUL


We will shortly celebrate 500 years since
the birth of the outstanding Spanish mystic,
theologian and scholar St. Teresa of Avila
(1515 – 1582). Dr Peter Tyler will be involved
with the celebrations to mark this event in
the UK and abroad and as a taster to this
special year of celebration he presents a day
exploring the life, times and spirituality of this
remarkable woman. No previous knowledge
of the saint is required. During the day he will
explore the circumstances of late medieval
Spain that formed the young saint and how
she responded to those circumstances in her
unique style of writing. As a woman given to
unusual experiences in prayer and of Jewish
descent she was particularly susceptible to
the investigations of the Holy Inquisition and
we shall examine how she dealt with this in
her work. We shall also look at her links with
her contemporaries and her relevance to
today’s spiritual seekers in a world and church
not so very different from the one she knew.



PROGRAMME
SATURDAY 1 FEBRUARY 2014
9.45am Registration
10.00am The Avila of St Teresa
11.15am Coffee/tea
11.45am A woman writing
1.00pm Lunch
2.00pm Mystical speech
3.15pm Coffee/tea
3.45pm Teresa today
5.00pm Course disperses


I am told there are 6 places left so book now if you want to join us... all welcome!

best

Peter



Friday, 24 January 2014

Thomas Merton and Christian Spirituality








Dear All

Following yesterday's post I thought I would post here the epilogue to 'The Bloomsbury Guide'. Re-reading it yesterday I like the exploration of Thomas Merton (1915 - 1968) and his contributions to our understanding of Christian spirituality. I hope you enjoy it.

best

Peter
 
 
 
Epilogue: Whither Christian Spirituality?

 

 

We began this book by asking the questions ‘What is Christian Spirituality?’, ‘Whence does it arise?’ and ‘What distinguishes Christian Spirituality from other spiritualities?’ Drawing on the breadth of wisdom presented in this volume, this concluding chapter will try to suggest a way forward for Christian spirituality. Or, as we may term it, what may be the key elements of a Christian spirituality for the Twenty First Century.

The beginning of the Millennium, starting with the terrible events of 9/11 and its aftermath, has challenged us to rethink how we can go forward as people of faith in a time of darkness. Although we may see around us despair and confusion what arises in the essays of this volume are the gentle words of peace of the Risen Lord that allow us to treasure in our hearts a ‘spirit of optimism’ intrinsic to Christian faith. In addressing this final question, which is very much a question of futures – our future, the future of our faith and the future of our planet – we would like to suggest some forms a ‘Christian spirituality for a New Millennium’ may take. To aid this reflection we will divide these characteristics into the following areas: contemplation, engaged social ethic, psychological insight, embodiment, God in the everyday, awareness of creation and ecumenism. In looking at these categories we shall draw in particular on the insight of the visionary twentieth-century American Trappist monk, Thomas Merton, whose life, career, and writings foreshadowed so many of the developments of the later twentieth century and still point the way ahead.

 

Contemplation

As we have seen, from the very beginnings of the Christian tradition contemplatio – the contemplation of the soul on the presence of God through the inspiration of the scriptures – has been central to all Christian spirituality. As we have seen the Desert Fathers and Mothers saw in contemplatio the vision of the ‘pure in heart’ mentioned in the Beatitudes (Mt. 5:8) and tried to live this through their solitary contemplation. A contemplatio taken up by St Benedict and Western monasticism and manifest through the Middle Ages in the traditions of theologia mystica, the Mendicant movements of St Francis and St Dominic and the great Spanish Carmelite mystics of the sixteenth century, St Teresa of Avila and St John of the Cross. Thus, as we enter our new Millennium we do so as heirs to this tradition of contemplation. The tradition is essentially heart-centred - although it is not anti-intellectual (as we have seen some of the greatest exponents of contemplatio have been intellectual giants of the Church, for example, St Thomas of Aquinas and Meister Eckhart), many proponents of the tradition have sought to place the intellect in context often through a use of teasing paradox or ‘shock tactics’ that throw a spanner into the restless whirring of the mind. It is succinctly put by the late Dominican scholar, Herbert McCabe:

         

Prayer is really a waste of time. The incarnate form of our prayer may be concerned with getting something done, forwarding our plans, and the generosity of God is such that he will let himself be incarnate even in these ways. But the very heart of prayer is not getting anything done. It is a waste of time, an even greater waste of time than play… For a real absolute waste of time you have to go to prayer.[1]

 

Thomas Merton makes the same point slightly differently in one of his last books, On Contemplative Prayer, published posthumously:

 

We should not look for a ‘method’ or ‘system’, but cultivate an ‘attitude’, an ‘outlook’: faith, openness, attention, reverence, expectation, supplication, trust, joy. All these finally permeate our being with love in so far as our living faith tells us we are in the presence of God, that we live in Christ, that in the Spirit of God we ‘see’ God our Father without ‘seeing’. We know him in ‘unknowing’.[2]

 

Prayer and contemplation are not, then, an ‘add-on’ to life, they are at the heart of life. This ‘divine unknowing’, what the medievals called the stulta sapientia (literally: ‘foolish wisdom’ cf. 1 Cor. 1) is thus the beginning of all wisdom and the heart of Christian contemplation. ‘It is the seriousness’, Merton reminds us, ‘of breathing when you’re drowning.’[3] Once we recognise our nothingness and helplessness before God then we can begin to pray. From such a perspective, even a coldness or impossibility to begin prayer is in itself a sign of this helplessness before God – a sign of His grace towards us and the necessity for our dependence upon God’s grace. For, as McCabe and Merton remind us in their own ways, ultimately there can only ever be one teacher of prayer – and that is the Holy Spirit.

Such a prayer, such a contemplatio, is not a fugit mundi, a flight from the world, but leads us back into life, into the arms of the world. Which leads us to our second aspect of a ‘Christian spirituality for the Twenty First Century’: an engaged social ethic.

 

An Engaged Social Ethic

One of the most precious insights of Christian contemplatives and writers in the past half century has been that there is no such thing as a Christian contemplation that does not engage with the world. Merton, the deeply contemplative Trappist monk, also engaged in the struggles of the anti-Vietnam protestors, the black rights groups and the anti-nuclear lobby. The ultimate irony was that after his sudden and tragic death in Bangkok in 1968 his body was transported back to the United States in the same aeroplane carrying the bodies of the young men and women killed in the Vietnam conflict.

          From Merton’s writings we can draw out three aspects of his understanding of such an engaged social ethic:

First, how such an ethic reiterates the essentially Trinitarian nature of Christian spirituality. As we have seen in this volume, much Christian discourse over the past half century has sought to re-engage with the Trinitarian model at the heart of Christian theology and social anthropology. For the modern theologians we could describe ourselves as homo relationis – instead of ‘I think therefore I am’, our twenty-first century motto could be ‘You are therefore I am’. As God is defined in terms of relatedness then our basic anthropology, as reflecting God’s triune life, can also be defined through relatedness.

One of the key characteristics of Christian spirituality in recent years has been the search for and, indeed, recovery of Christian community. L’Arche, Iona, Taizé, Focolare are just a few of the new movements that have sought to refind Christian community and have proved especially popular with the young. Such communities have all, in their own way, sought to rediscover the essential communitarian, trinitarian basis that lies at the heart of Christian anthropology.

The second aspect of our understanding of the ‘engaged social ethic’ is our relationship to and analysis of violence in society. In Faith and Violence Merton places our First World Western consumerist behaviour in the context of a radical social analysis that still bites today:

 

The population of the affluent world is nourished on a steady diet of brutal mythology and hallucination, kept at a constant pitch of high tension by a life that is intrinsically violent in that it forces a large part of the population to submit to an existence which is humanly intolerable… The problem of violence, then, is not the problem of a few rioters and rebels, but the problem of a whole structure which is outwardly ordered and respectable, and inwardly ridden by psychopathic obsessions and delusions. [4]

 

The third and final part of our understanding of this social ethic in a way combines our first point with our second: that there can be no social engagement unless it is rooted in deep contemplation and awareness of self. In the famous ‘Letter to an Activist’ written to Jim Forrest on 21 February 1965, Merton emphasises the importance of not attaching to the results of activism: ‘face the fact that your work will be apparently worthless and even achieve no result at all, if not perhaps results opposite to what you expect.’[5] ‘All the good that you will do’ he adds, ‘will come not from you but from the fact that you have allowed yourself, in the obedience of faith, to be used by God’s love.’ Along with alcohol, sex, food and consumer goods, it seems we can add social activism to the list of things we use to fill the void that lies at the centre of our aching hearts. ‘The great thing’ he concludes ‘is to live, not to pour out your life in the service of a myth: and we turn the best things into myths.’

 

Psychological Insight

The past century has seen enormous strides in our understanding of the psyche, its subtleties and forms. Sadly this has not necessarily been matched with a concomitant increase in our awareness of the integration of the spiritual and psychological. For historical reasons, modern psychology grew up with a distrust and wariness towards religion, an attitude which was by and large reciprocated by the churches. Fortunately the past two decades have seen a rapprochement in this attitude with both sides willing to dialogue and learn from each other. There have, of course, been notable exceptions on both sides and from the Catholic tradition both Thomas Merton, and his near contemporary, the British Benedictine monk, Dom Bede Griffiths, stand out.

In a letter written in the 1960s to a friend of his, Dr Mary Allen, a Jungian analyst, Griffiths makes some startling analogies between the psychological insights of the twentieth century and the ancient Christian ascetic traditions of the Desert Fathers and Mothers. For Griffiths the life of prayer is essentially a ‘reordering’ of the unconscious through the reflection of God’s love: ‘The point is that though these sins (Pride, Lust etc) are largely unconscious our will has consented to them. This is the mystery of original sin’.[6] Much of the life of prayer then, becomes for Griffiths, a purification of the unconscious on this radical level: ‘We are all by nature under the  power of these forces of the unconscious. . .  these forces may be kept down, to some extent a kind of balance established, and that is the normal human condition, but it is very inadequate’. Struggling with the forces of the unconscious we have two choices – to repress them or to give way to them in an undiscriminating fashion – ‘becoming slaves to passion’.  The first option, so common in the West, represses these forces so much that we become slaves to them, in which case we are controlled by the all-controlling, all-powerful, all-knowing ego. ‘The average Christian’ says Griffiths, ‘simply represses the unconscious like everyone else and lives from their will and reason’.

          However, in baptism in Christ we have entered the deepest depths of the unconscious to allow their purification: ‘It is Christ alone who can set us free from the unconscious. Baptism is a descent beneath the waters, a conflict with Satan (in which the soul is mystically identified with Christ) in which the daemonic powers are defeated and the healing powers of the unconscious are realised to give birth to new life.’ This, for Griffiths, is what should happen in our Christian life – ‘The Holy Spirit should penetrate to the depth of the unconscious to the ultimate root of being, and transform us.’

So many of us, especially in the West, lock up the forces of the unconscious and are terrified of opening up their contents ( often with good reason), alternatively we see around us total unconscious ‘acting out’ of the destructive unconscious forces of the psyche. The Life of Christ penetrating into the darkest depths of the unconscious can bring liberation and healing in a most unexpected and profound way. The goal, following Griffiths, is to bring about a marriage of the conscious and unconscious, the male and female, animus and anima in which each is preserved and reintegrated in Christ.

Examining the lives of Thomas Merton and Bede Griffiths we see exactly this ‘reintegration of the self in Christ’ through marriage of different poles of the self. Merton, living from the unconscious as a young man embraces the hard ethical demands of the Christian life when he enters the Trappist monastery of Gethsemani (as does Griffiths when he enters Prinknash Abbey), only with age and experience realising that the hard edges of ego-control have to be surrendered to allow a softer entrance of the spirit into all aspects of the self, bringing about what Blake calls the ‘marriage of heaven and earth’. As we saw above in the chapters written by Richard Rohr and Bernadette Flanagan, it is highly likely that through deepening awareness of the gendered life of the Spirit that Christians will increasingly learn to articulate the spiritual quest in the Twenty First Century.

 

Embodiment

The Christian spirituality of the new Millennium will not only be psychologically aware but embodied. It takes all aspects of the self seriously, including the erotic. A point observed by Pope Benedict XVI in his encyclical Deus Caritas Est. Benedict’s encyclical restores eros to its rightful place at the centre of Christian life, reinvigorated and renewed in agape: ‘Man is truly himself when his body and soul are intimately united; the challenge of eros can be said to be truly overcome when this unification is achieved.’[7]

The new spirituality is not just a school of the head but a school of the heart and intuition that gives as much importance to the arts, liturgy and embodied expression as it does to scholastic theology. As Merton puts it in Zen and the Birds of Appetite: ‘In our need for whole and integral experience of our own self on all its levels, bodily as well as imaginative, emotional, intellectual, spiritual, there is not place for the cultivation of one part of human consciousness, one aspect of human experience, at the expense of others, even on the pretext that what is cultivated is sacred and all the rest profane. A  false and divisive ‘sacredness’ or ‘supernaturalism’ can only cripple us.’ [8]

 

God in the Everyday

The breakdown of the barrier between the sacred and the secular leads to our fifth aspect of the spirituality for the Twenty First Century –the breakdown of the barrier between the ordinary and the extra-ordinary. It is what the eighteenth-century Jesuit Jean Pierre de Caussade referred to as the ‘sacrament of the present moment’. Merton, again, put it thus: ‘There is no longer any place for the kind of idealistic philosophy that removes all reality into the celestial realms and makes temporal existence meaningless… we need to find ultimate sense here and now in the ordinary humble tasks and human problems of every day.’[9] Merton himself, following the artistic example of his parents, was a keen photographer and his photographs, illustrate the ‘quiddity’, the ‘this-ness’ of everyday objects. The essence of the Creator ‘shining out like shook foil’ in all creation.[10]

 

Awareness of Creation

This awareness of the present moment – ‘the power of now’ – leads to a wider cosmic awareness and our own place within creation. Faced with the ecological disasters of the late twentieth century we are forced more and more to reassess our place within creation and our commitments and responsibilities to the world around us. Merton in the late sixties talked about the need to address those problems ‘ which threaten our very survival as a species on earth.’[11] How prescient he was in this respect and how pressing now the task which is finally being taken up by contemporary theologians as explored so well above by John Chryssavgis and Mary Grey amongst others.

 

Ecumenical

The seventh and final aspect of our ‘Christian spirituality for the Twenty First Century’ is the importance of openness to dialogue between the Christian denominations and the faiths. As we have seen in this volume, in the past decades, following the decrees of Nostra Aetate at the Second Vatican Council, the Roman Catholic Church has embraced ecumenical and interfaith dialogue with gusto under the pontificate of Pope John Paul II and now under Pope Benedict XVI. Slowly we talk to each other and slowly we edge towards healing the scandalous divisions of centuries. As we live at this precarious moment in our planet’s future the ecumenical imperative becomes even more important than ever. As with all our seven aspects of the spirituality for the new Millennium, Merton was again ahead of his time embracing dialogue with Buddhists, Muslims, Jews, Hindus and Sikhs. The four chapters above have articulated in some depth the perils and promises that this new dialogue will be revealing in the coming decades of the new century.

 

Conclusion: ‘A New Role for Religion’

So then, our personal list of the seven aspects of the ‘Christian Spirituality for the Twenty First Century’, or better, an ‘Engaged Christian Spirituality for the New Millennium’ embraces contemplatio, an engaged social ethic, psychological insight, embodiment, God in the everyday, awareness of Creation and the ecumenical.

                   Reading the contributors to this volume there is always a sense of optimism. It is a sense that God the Father, through the Holy Spirit and Jesus Christ is leading us into new paths and new ways that are unknown to us. We live in Meister Eckhart’s Now-Moment, the place of potential and renewal where the Eternal Creator gives birth to the Eternal Child within us if we will but let it happen.  As the great tenth-century Orthodox theologian, St Symeon the New Theologian, reminds us, the natural condition of Christians is to be caught up in the great Cosmic renewal of the Logos by birthright from baptism, what is extraordinary is that we have forgotten who we are and how we are related to the cosmos. In this new ecumenical spirit – the great spirit of renewal which blows through our churches at the present time – we are called and challenged once again to respond to the great tradition of 2000 years of Christian spirituality in a new positive spirit of optimism and humility.

 

 

 

Bibliography and Further Reading

 

Baker, R. and Henry, G. (1999), Merton and Sufism: The Untold Story. Louisville: Fons Vitae.

 

Pope Benedict XVI (2005), Deus Caritas Est. Accessible on www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals.

 

McCabe, H. (2002), God Still Matters. London: Continuum.

 

Merton, T. (1967), Mystics and Zen Masters, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

(1968a), Faith and Violence, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

(1968b), Zen and the Birds of Appetite, New York: New Directions.

(1973), Contemplative Prayer. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.

(1985), The Hidden Ground of Love: The Letters of Thomas Merton on Religious Experience and Social Concerns, ed. William H Shannon. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

 

 

 



[1] McCabe, H. (2002), God Still Matters. London: Continuum, p.75.
[2] Merton, T. (1973), Contemplative Prayer. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, p.39.
[3] Merton,’ Lectures to Novices’, quoted in Baker, R. and Henry, G. (1999), Merton and Sufism: The Untold Story. Louisville: Fons Vitae, p.154.
 
 
[4] Merton, T. (1968), Faith and Violence, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, pp.78-79.
[5]Merton, T. (1985), The Hidden Ground of Love: The Letters of Thomas Merton on Religious Experience and Social Concerns, ed. William H Shannon. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
 
[6] Griffiths, B. (2005), ‘Letter to Dr Mary Allen’  reprinted in the Bede Griffiths Sangha Newsletter. March 2005, Vol 8:1
[7] Pope Benedict XVI, (2005) Deus Caritas Est. Accessible on www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals.
[8] Merton, T. (1968a), Zen and the Birds of Appetite. New York: New Directions, p. 30
[9] Ibid.
[10] See also Pearson, P. (2003), The Paradox of Place: Thomas Merton’s Photography. Louisville, KY: Thomas Merton Centre at Bellarmine University.
[11] Merton, T. (1968a): 30.