Day Two of the Summer School here at the Oblate School of Theology, San Antonio, Texas and as always many questions about Teresa of Avila and the Inquisition. I am posting here a section from my book which I will using tonight with the class.
Many thanks again to Fr Ronald Rolheiser, Cliff Knighten, Greg Zuschlag and John Markey OP for making all this possible...
Smoke and Rock: Teresa’s Lineage
Until the mid-20th
century most official biographers and commentators on Teresa had accepted the
projected Ahumada-Cepeda[1]
family picture of an ancient Castilian Christian family always ready to defend
the Catholic faith and play a significant role in the ‘re-Christianisation’ (la reconquista) of Muslim Spain.[2]
Although, as mentioned, hints and suggestions find their way into Teresa’s
writings we had little idea of her actual family lineage itself until
comparatively recently. Within a decade of her death in 1582 none of the
dispositions for the processes which would lead to her canonisation mention any
doubt over her ‘pure blood’ and in fact emphasise her ‘noble’ lineage or that
she was of ‘old Christian’ blood (See Egido 1980: 135-7).[3]
This fiction is repeated for the next four centuries in her ensuing
biographies, sadly reinforced by and reinforcing the need to ally religious
with political (usually Christian nationalist) sensibilities.
This
was to all change dramatically in 1946 when an extraordinary document was found
by Alonso Cortés in the municipal archives of Valladolid . What is even more remarkable
about this document is that it ‘disappeared’ from the archives not long after
it had been found in 1960 only to mysteriously reappear 26 years later in 1986.
At this point it was immediately transcribed by Teófanes Egido and published in
his key work El Linaje Judeoconverso de
Santa Teresa (Egido 1986). The document, a pleito de hidalguía or lawsuit of nobility, is reproduced in full
in Egido’s text and details the attempt by Teresa’s father and three brothers
to prove their ‘noble’ blood, largely to avoid the new tax imposed by the
recently crowned King, Carlos I/ Charles V, in 1519. The case began that same
year and seemed to start off well with good supporting arguments from the four
brothers: Alonso (Teresa’s father), Pedro and Ruy Sanchez and Francisco
Alvares.[4]
However as the case proceeds all sorts of counter-witnesses begin to appear
from the woodwork. From the
testimonies we discover that Teresa’s great-grandparents, Teresa and Alonso de
Sanchez (presumably ‘Teresa’ was a popular name in the family) lived in the
Saint Olalla or Saint Leocadia district of Toledo. Here their son, Juan
Sanchez, the father of the Cepeda brothers, was born, later becoming a cloth
and fine silk merchant who would eventually move to the Calle de Andrino in
Avila sometime in the 1480s. In Avila the family was known as the toledanos (Juan appeared to adopt the
name ‘Juan de Toledo’) and they continued the cloth business in an area known
for the many Jews and conversos living
there. Juan Sanchez, said some of the witnesses, was a man of great importance,
having given help to King Henry IV and the Archbishop of Santiago, he also had
a considerable fortune. Later, the family would move away from the cloth trade
and live the life more fitting to minor nobility or hidalguía. The four boys thus had all the qualities for this
station in life: they had the good pedigree and were loyal to the crown in the
practice of arms.
So
far so good, as far as the Cepeda brothers were concerned. However, from spring
1520 contrary voices start to creep into the narrative. On 9th
March, for example, Bernardo Platero, a resident of Avila, testifies that Juan
Sanchez was ‘reconciled’ by the Inquisition in Toledo and wore there the ‘sanbenitillo’ – the strange garment of humiliation that
those tried by the Inquisition had to wear as they processed through the
streets for public ridicule (Egido 1986:167).[5]
Juan González de las Piñuelas, another resident of Avila who knew the family
well, provided further details on 12th May, testifying that Juan
Sanchez ‘wore the sanbenitillo with
its crosses publicly in procession with the other “reconciled ones” and walked
in procession from church to church for seven Fridays in succession’ (Egido
1986:170). This was so damning for the brothers’ case that it had to be
postponed while testimony was sought from the Inquisitorial office in Toledo.
This was duly forthcoming with the final confirmation of Juan Sanchez’s
‘reconciliation’:
(It
is certified by the Holy Office of the Inquisition of the city and archdiocese of Toledo) that on the 22nd
day of the month of June, in the
year 1485, Johan de Toledo, merchant, son of Alonso Sanchez, inhabitant of Toledo in the district
of Santa Leocadia, gave, presented and
swore to a confession before the then Lord Inquisitors, in which he said and confessed that he had done and
committed many serious crimes and
offences of heresy and apostasy against our holy Catholic faith. (Egido 1986:189)
However, even more interesting is
that one of Teresa’s uncles Hernando or Fernando Sanchez did not seem to be
reconciled. Egido speculates that this ‘mysterious’ uncle died early, however
we do not as yet know more about him (he appears to have left for Salamanca to
study).
Yet
despite this damning evidence the Cepedas duly received their noble status in
August 1522, suggesting that a certain amount of wealth, liberally disposed,
could always have the necessary effect.
[1]
Teresa’s family names, literally ‘Smoke’ and ‘Rock’. See, for example, Efrén de
la Madre de Dios 1951: 160: ‘St Teresa
esteemed highly, as did everyone, having been born of noble parents; from her
earliest childhood she would hear in her house interminable praise of her noble
background.’ This statement was corrected in later versions of the work.
[2]
For more on the political and social background of La Reconquista see my John of
the Cross, Chapter 1.
[3]
‘Old Christian’ was a term used to refer to families who had not been ‘tainted’
by Jewish or Muslim blood during the ‘occupation’ of Spain by the Muslims. As the 16th
century proceeded such designations, connected with the so-called ‘statutes of
pure blood’, would become increasingly important in delineating a person’s
social standing in post-reconquista
Spain (For more on this see, for example, Elliott 2002).
[4]
For more on the confusing, often converso,
practice of switching and adopting multiple surnames see Davies 1981.
[5] We
have some later representations of this odd garment. It was like a rough tunic
on which was painted the diagonal cross of St Andrew in red ink. Towards the
end of the Inquisition, in the 18th century, the sanbenito would designate all sorts of degrees and types of heresy
and apostasy. See Roth 1995.
No comments:
Post a Comment